Search for: "United States v. Scott"
Results 901 - 920
of 2,705
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm
In Dred Scott v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:48 am
The ImmigrationProf Blog is hosting an online symposium on United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Doe and Doe v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed… [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:11 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 3:20 pm
Earlier this week, Rutgers Law Professor Sherry Colb had this column at FindLaw on the Court's ruling in the high speed chase case, Scott v. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 5:02 am
But a Supreme Court decision in 1969, Powell v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:42 am
Hovenkamp ("[P]otential [patent] defendants can do better by forming a litigation cost-sharing agreement: a contractual agreement that divides a member's defense costs among the group when the plaintiff is a PAE, and which requires members to litigate predatory claims to judgment.")The Failed Promise of User Fees: Empirical Evidence from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, by Michael Frakes & Melissa F. [read post]
19 May 2014, 1:42 am
Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages Ltd & Anor, heard 3 – 5 March 2014. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 2:22 pm
Tip: even if there might be a valid point somewhere in the decision (and I’m not saying there is), you should consider whether another case (or six) making that point might be available before citing Dred Scott v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:51 pm
As Scott Lemieux states, "[u]nder current practices, the AUMF George W. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
United States, 929 F.2d 1235, 1239 (8th Cir. 1991), decided before the Supreme Court decided Daubert.) [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:11 am
Notice Pleading Restoration Act, S. 1504, 111th Cong. (2009): “Except as otherwise expressly provided by an Act of Congress or by an amendment to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which takes effect after the date of enactment of this Act, a Federal court shall not dismiss a complaint under rule 12(b)(6) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, except under the standards set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States in Conley v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:00 pm
”Ang et al v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 12:28 pm
Hall, “a free citizen of this state,” because three prosecution witnesses were Chinese. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
In Doe v. [read post]
