Search for: "United States v. Small" Results 901 - 920 of 6,878
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2011, 8:49 pm
These were the facts that supported the jury's finding of a fraudulent scheme: • The check cashing and payday loan business had no state license; • The defendant hid his connection to the business by omitting his name on corporate records and license applications; • He told his salesmen that the business was profitable when it made no profit; • Only a small portion of investor funds went into expansion of the Loan Shoppe; • High rates of return were… [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 6:45 am by John H Curley
The arbitrator's award must be affirmed, and summary judgment is therefore granted to Merck.The Court's decision in  United Steelworkers, Local 10-00086 v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm by Mark Walsh
 June 30 is the latest the Court has sat since 1996, when the Justices took the bench on July 1 to issue just a single opinion, United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:51 pm by Douglas Berman
In so doing, the Fifth Circuit rejected Molina-Martinez’s contention, based on Supreme Court dicta in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:00 am by Thomas Kaufman
  The Wang II decision follows a remand from the United States Supreme Court which had reversed the original Wang judgment in light of the inconsistencies between the lower courts' rulings and the certification standards the Supreme Court announced in Dukes v. [read post]
The District Court expressly agreed with the Second and Eleventh Circuit’s interpretations of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Walling v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 2:11 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found in favor of Eisai in Aciphex patent infringement suit against Teva Pharmaceuticals and Dr. [read post]
10 May 2017, 10:20 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 See HealthCare.gov/Small-Business to enroll your small business or non-profit employees or get more details. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am by Sheppard Mullin
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:06 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix.
In HM Treasury v Ahmed, the Supreme Court had considered section 1(1) of the United Nations Act 1946 Act. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
Second, when the Fourteenth Amendment provides that “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States,” that means that all persons born in the United States are natural-born citizens (setting aside those not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States, a very small category that may cover children of diplomats… [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 10:15 pm by Leland E. Beck
Litigation: The United States District Court for the District of Columbia will hear cross motions to dismiss / summary judgment in National Restaurant Association [NRA] v. [read post]