Search for: "United States v. Stock" Results 901 - 920 of 2,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2008, 6:59 pm
The idea was proposed to Span, which agreed on the understanding that the $300,000 would be paid back, the preferred units would be converted to common units, and Span would end up with a 10% ownership interest in Triumph. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
Carvin of Jones Day in Washington (30 minutes), for the United States will be Solicitor General Elena Kagan (20 minutes), and for the Board will be Jeffrey A. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 8:55 am by admin
  The article also dismissed this claim as overly “ambitious” for a company that “trades at only eight cents per share on the lowly ‘pink sheets’ in the United States”. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 6:46 am by Bradley Joondeph
But the Court’s affirmance in Lexmark was matched by a unanimous reversal in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:30 am by S S
The claimants argued that, reliant on M v Newham [2020] EWHC 32, the duty was immediate, unqualified and non-deferrable. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 11:06 am by Jeralyn
THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION GUARANTEES THE ACCUSED THE RIGHT TO COMPULSORY PROCESS FOR WITNESSES IN ITS DEFENSE. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 2:33 pm by Christine Dowling
United States, a unanimous decision authored by Justice Ginsberg (Justice Kagen did not participate). [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 3:04 am by Edward Smith
Residential Availability Uncertain Roundup™ is a commercial and residential weedkiller that has been available in the United States since the 1970s. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
”  As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 2:07 pm by Florian Mueller
A second attempt by Apple to overturn a 5G iPhone and iPad sales ban in Colombia has just failed as a Colombian court denied a petition by Apple, but the iPhone maker hasn't exhausted all procedural options yet.The first failed attempt was an emergency motion that Apple had brought with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 6:24 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
  Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express 'the thought that we hate.' United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 1:54 pm by Florian Mueller
The FTC has filed the following complaint with the the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (this post continues below the document): 17-01-17 FTC Complaint v. [read post]