Search for: "United States v. United States Dist. Ct."
Results 901 - 920
of 979
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
For purposes of the Graves Amendment, section 30102(a)(6) of Chapter 301 of Title 49 of the United States Code, entitled Motor Vehicle Safety, defines "motor vehicle" as "a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power and manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways, but does not include a vehicle operated only on a rail line. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
He received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Michigan State University in 1968 and his Masters degree from Michigan State University in 1971. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 6:31 am
—Houston [1st Dist.] [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:21 pm
United States, 64 F.3d 206 (5th Cir. 1995); Barnes v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
” More importantly, citing the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 1:09 pm
SIPPEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 6:23 am
Dist. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Recent developments in Texas, United States, and international energy law. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 7:08 pm
Dist. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
" Indiana: State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm
No. 4J, 301 Or. 358 (1986), appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 480 U.S. 942 (1987) (over the dissenting votes of Brennan, Marshall, & O'Connor, JJ.); United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
" This basic principle, namely that the requirement of probable cause to permit entry into a private home is not excused based upon any relative perceived societal importance, was further articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Mincey v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:52 am
Dist. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:00 am
Judges who like to rhyme: United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:09 pm
The notice must also state that a forfeiture action "may be filed against the property. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
Dist. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 8:23 am
Ct. [read post]
