Search for: "United States v. Walker" Results 901 - 920 of 1,213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Brian Connor
The SIFI classification—which is currently limited to the largest banks in the United States—enables increased scrutiny by the U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 9:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Before coming to the FTC, Lesley clerked for United States District Judge Fred Shannon in the Western District of Texas, served as a staff counsel to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and was a fellow at Georgetown’s Appellate Litigation Clinical Program,. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:58 am by James Hamilton
It is not for a UK court to go further into that conclusion, said Lord Mance, which may yet be challenged in further United States litigation. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
The book argues that the binary state-versus-federal-government model that is today taken to be the essence of American federalism does not correspond to the legal or political reality of the United States in the early nineteenth century. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:38 am by Jacob Wirz
Since 1984, the United States has only experienced ~12 years (30.8%) of unified government. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:43 am by Aaron
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/02/28/08-56349.pdf United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 11:34 am by Steve Gottlieb
— This commentary was scheduled for broadcast on WAMC Northeast Report on August 11, 2020. [1] https://www.npr.org/2020/06/27/884213464/dc-statue-of-lincoln-standing-over-a-formerly-enslaved-man-sparks-controversy [2] United States v Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875). [3] I don’t know if Goldman ever wrote up his lecture but here’s a link to someone else’s reconstruction,… [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:15 am
Inspired by the notion, described in this recent post, that no reasonable consumer in the United States might regard a product branded 'vitaminwater' as being a healthy beverage, several of the Kats' correspondents have been sending him amusing items from their own jurisdictions which reflect upon things that reasonable consumers might not consider. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
The New Zealand tort, unlike the English tort, also requires the publication be highly offensive to a reasonable person in the plaintiff’s shoes (see Henderson v Walker). [read post]