Search for: "United States v. Walker" Results 901 - 920 of 1,213
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2010, 3:23 am by Russ Bensing
  I first read about Cruise Law News; it’s a blog done by Jim Walker of Walker & O’Neill, who are “maritime lawyers. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am by Kelly
Ambu AS (Patently-O) CAFC: Preamble held not limiting because body of claim sets forth complete invention: American Medical Systems v Biolitec (Filewrapper) District Court E D Michigan: General allegations of deceptive intent fail to state a claim for false marking: Josephs v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:53 pm by Richard Renner
United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia, Athens Division. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am by Dave
In particular, the Court must examine whether the decision-making process leading to measures of interference was fair and such as to afford due respect to the interests safeguarded to the individual by Article 8 (see Buckley v. the United Kingdom, 25 September 1996, § 76, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27138/95, § 92, ECHR 2001-I; and Connors, cited above, §§ 83 and 92) 68. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 1:57 am
"   Third Circuit decides case at the intersection of the FCRA and PATRIOT Act Foley & Lardner LLP"In Cortez v Trans Union LLC, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided a case at the intersection of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, better known as the USA PATRIOT Act (Patriot Act). [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 4:08 am
The New School, 14 N.Y.3d 469 (2010), the New York Court of Appeals settled the open question of whether the Faragher-Ellerth affirmative defense available under federal law applies to sexual harassment and retaliation claims brought under the New York City Human Rights Law (“NYCHRL”).United States Department of Labor to revise regulations on reporting of costs related to union organizing campaignsBond Schoeneck & KingAs part of its Spring 2010 regulatory agenda,… [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:00 am by Anna Christensen
United States (09-5801) Respondent’s brief in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 6:55 am by Federal and Extradition Defense
"The delay of which he complains, although not as long as in some other cases, see Doggett, 505 U.S. at 648 (eight and one half year delay); United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 6:33 am by Anna Christensen
In response to readers’ questions, Eugene Volokh explains at the Volokh Conspiracy why United States v. [read post]