Search for: "Utter v. Utter" Results 901 - 920 of 2,630
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2015, 2:06 am
The case is NOCN (Formerly National Open College Network) v Open College Network Credit4Learning [2015] EWHC 2667 (IPEC), a 25 September 2015 decision of Judge Hacon in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales (the celebrated IPEC). [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 6:02 pm by Hannah Diaz
The rounds continued to challenge participants as the night progressed, especially during the Supreme Court Audio Round, where everyone listened intently to Justice Ginsburg's timeless words, "make pot legal" and "bong hits for Jesus" while trying to name the court case they had been uttered during (Walker v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:56 pm
But still the rumours persist: whispers around the hearthside, hushed conversations in ale-houses, and meek utterances made through the froth of lattes and macchiatos consumed on the Strand. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:14 am by SHG
  But then the Supremes decided Berghuis v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 3:48 pm
That it does (or may) not in the broadcast context is owing to the Court's decision in FCC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
   In the first round before the Justices, the case had involved the ban as it applied to four-letter words, even if they were uttered “fleetingly,” only a single time. [read post]