Search for: "Vanderbilt Law Review"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,064
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2025, 12:17 pm
A nationwide Clerkships Database (“Glassdoor for Judges,”) where judicial law clerks nationwide could review their powerful, unaccountable bosses, and law students nationwide could, for the first time, read thousands of reviews to identify great bosses to apply to, and abusive judges and poor managers to avoid. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
In a recent paper, Ari Peskoe, a fellow at Harvard Law School, argues that courts reviewing these challenges should find that New York and Ilinois’s programs do not conflict with federal law. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:06 pm
Or Brandon Garrett’s critique of the use of eyewitness identification in the courtroom in his Vanderbilt Law Review piece, Eyewitness and Exclusion. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:48 am
The lineup includes: Dennis Carlton (Chicago GSB) Dan Crane (Michigan Law) Robert Gertner (Chicago GSB) Herbert Hovenkamp (Iowa) Einer Elhauge (Harvard) Joe Farrell (Federal Trade Commission) Luke Froeb (Vanderbilt) Andrew Gavil (Howard) Thom Lambert (Missouri) Geoff Manne (LECG) Steve Salop (Georgetown) J. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 8:11 pm
For the second time in four years, it is considering raising the minimum bar-passage-rate requirement as part of a comprehensive review of law school accreditation standards. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 7:54 pm
Next up was Ed Rubin of Vanderbilt, talking of how he brought his law school into the twentieth century (modest goals...). [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 6:34 am
Review here my report on the first day of the conference.Images by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo, taken during the event. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 5:18 am
This group has legitimate criticisms, many of which I have tried, via hundreds of law review pages—to analyze, and even endorse, in specific instances. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 5:18 am
This group has legitimate criticisms, many of which I have tried, via hundreds of law review pages—to analyze, and even endorse, in specific instances. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:19 pm
Patrick Lynch and Kyle McEntee: These enterprising gents from Vanderbilt Law founded Law School Transparency (LST), a group committed to keeping law schools honest in reporting the employment outcomes of their graduates. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Humira (Adalimumab) – US: Bayer HealthCare files patent infringement suit against Abbott Laboratories over Humira; Abbott fires back with lawsuit claiming Bayer’s patent invalid, not infringed or unenforceable (Law360) (Law360) (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) (Patent Baristas) Sprycel (Dasatinib)… [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 10:00 am
Speir Professor of Law at Vanderbilt University Law School. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 4:40 am
It maintains an extensive database of international case law. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:39 am
: An Empirical Assessment of the PTO’s Granting Patterns, 66 Vanderbilt Law Review (forthcoming 2013), Professors Melissa Wasserman and Michael Frakes analyze more than two decades of patent grant rates to identify how factors like entity size and technology affect an applicant’s ability to receive a patent. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 3:52 am
Weeks later, Baker announces he is leaving Duke for Vanderbilt University. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
If Congress delegated authority to the agency to take actions carrying the force of law (e.g., rulemaking or adjudication) and the agency acted pursuant to that authority, then the court reviews the interpretation under Chevron. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:47 am
First, it invalidated the law facially, as opposed to as-applied to the plaintiffs. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 8:28 am
We have engaged Elevate Services to review bills and inform us what a fair rate is. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 10:14 pm
Conk (Fordham Law School) has posted Will the Post 9/11 World be a Post-Tort World? [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
The court’s discretion in arts 34 and 36 implicates one of the basic issues in modern arbitration law, namely the extent of the court’s role in reviewing awards. [read post]
