Search for: "WILLIAMS v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 901 - 920
of 3,300
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2018, 3:04 am
“Critical habitat” where a species doesn’t live and can’t survive is subject of pending SCOTUS case [Ilya Shapiro and Meggan DeWitt on Cato brief in Weyerhaeuser v. [read post]
13 May 2018, 4:09 pm
On 11 May 2018 Nicol J handed down judgment in the case of Reid v Newsquest (Midlands South) Ltd. [read post]
12 May 2018, 9:11 am
William R. [read post]
11 May 2018, 9:32 pm
In Oracle v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 10:49 pm
William W. [read post]
5 May 2018, 6:00 am
Franklin California, 579 U.S. _ (2016). [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm
(For purposes of the discussion, the participants really didn’t draw many distinctions between public and private universities, since most prominent private universities try to hold themselves—sometimes, as in California, because state law requires them to do so—to the same First Amendment standards that bind public institutions. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:09 am
Williams, for Defendant-Appellee. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
It undergirded the English Civil War and the American Revolution; it helped shape the French Revolution; it got Karl Marx arrested; and in 1970s California it fired up an activist named Howard Jarvis, who shocked the political establishment with the success of Proposition 13, generally regarded as the first battleground of the modern property tax revolt.[1] With the benefit of hindsight, Proposition 13’s success appears obvious. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 1:18 pm
Supreme Court case California v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 5:48 am
Friday the 13th wasn't Huawei's lucky day, but it went well for Samsung: in accordance with an inclination he expressed at a recent motion hearing, Judge William H. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:01 am
A mini-roundup: “How State Pension Funds — and 401k Managers — Prioritize Politics over Returns” [Ike Brannon, Cato/Forbes.com; related, Eric V. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 8:25 am
” Williams v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:00 am
In my last EntertainHR blog post, I discussed the 2006 California Supreme Court’s decision in Lyle v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:00 am
In my last EntertainHR blog post, I discussed the 2006 California Supreme Court’s decision in Lyle v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
In addition to regulating behavior during armed conflict, Protocols II and V, specifically, require parties to a conflict to take specific measures post-conflict to reduce the dangers posed by mines, booby traps, and other forms of unexploded and abandoned ordnance. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 9:30 am
Koch, Jr., and William S. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:30 pm
By William W. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 11:35 am
In Hernan Osorio v. [read post]
