Search for: "Warner v. State"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
The shareholder proposal appears quite similar to the one in AOL Time Warner Inc., in which case the SEC initially denied the company's request for no-action relief in December of 2002, but then subsequently issued a No-Action letter, stating that there "appeared to be some basis" that a contested election could result.[7] The initial letter is one of many which are demonstrative of the SEC implementing its pre-1990 interpretation of the Rule, which the Commission… [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:01 am
Borg Warner Corp., et al., 2017 IL App (1st) 162398-Unpub. [2] Gridley v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 8:58 am
Under Skilling v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 1:17 pm
In Community for Creative Non-Violence v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 11:51 pm
I am referring in particular to cases 158/86 (Warner), 341/87 (EMI Electrola/Patricia) and 62/79 (Coditel v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 4:28 am
Warner v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 8:16 am
Fischer (2005, 2011) Thinking Like a Writer: A Lawyer’s Guide to Writing and Editing, by Steven V. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 1:38 pm
(Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
To establish a false advertising claim, Pernod must prove the following under Warner-Lambert v Breathasure (2000), that:Bacardi made false or misleading statements as to his own product [or another's];there is actual deception or at least a tendency to deceive a substantial portion of the intended audience;the deception is material in that it is likely to influence purchasing decisions;the advertised goods travel in interstate commerce; andthere is a likelihood of injury to… [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 11:19 am
State Legislative Developments Algorithmic Discrimination & Consumer Protection: The Colorado AI Act (SB 205) was signed into law on May 17, making Colorado the first state to enact AI legislation addressing risks of algorithmic discrimination in the development and deployment of AI. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
State Bd. of Exam'rs. of Pub. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:17 am
Int’l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:00 am
Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics (Pharma Patents) US: CAFC Affirms district court de novo review in section 146 action: Streck v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
On the same day, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWCA Civ 1073, dismissing by a majority the appeal from the decision of Nicol J, which struck out the Appellant’s claims in libel and data protection as abuse. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:48 am
The CJEU ruling is out: Internetportal und Marketing GmbH v Richard Schlicht (Domain Name / Nom de Domaine!) [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 3:35 am
A communication from one location within a state to another location within that same state which passes through another state may satisfy the interstate requirement, even if the defendant has no reason to know of the interstate character of the communication.U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am
”Herein, it seems important to discuss the case of Keep Thomson v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 7:30 am
Ent. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:19 am
Entm't, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:36 am
(IP Dragon) Europe L’Oréal v eBay: a warning to online marketplace operators (JIPLP) Germany Apple v. [read post]
