Search for: "Whiting v. United States" Results 901 - 920 of 6,080
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2010, 7:47 am by zshapiro
Section One states: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:56 am by NCC Staff
But perhaps the Chief Justice’s highest-profile case was United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2024, 2:23 pm by Marie Nganele
Jim Mahon, a shareholder in Becker’s Business Litigation Practice, was featured in a Law360 article, for a unique argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 10:09 am by David Markus
Attorneys Award for “Superior Litigation Team” in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 3:01 am
Toomey, citing School District 6 v NYSHRB, 35 NY2d 371, said that such a personnel policy, even if the product of negotiations under [the Taylor Law] would violate the State’s Human Rights Law and is therefore a prohibited subject of negotiations.* See Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:37 am
To allow a defendant an opportunity to try his or her case civilly first would allow the defendant to get to see the government's evidence and witnesses while the stakes are lower.The decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:22 pm by David R. Papke
Fortunately, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Shelley v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 6:19 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case involves an allegation of racial discrimination against two white state workers who claim they were denied a position because the state wanted to promote a Black employee instead. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:19 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision written by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor in Grutter v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:19 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision written by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor in Grutter v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 4:51 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
”  Similarly, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, in Lucky Cousins Trucking, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which it will consider a Pennsylvania woman’s argument that the Constitution does not give Congress the power to make her conduct – an effort to poison a romantic rival – criminal, even if the federal laws in which it did so were enacted to implement an international treaty prohibiting the use and proliferation of chemical weapons. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm by Matt C. Bailey
Keilholtz, 268 F.R.D at 336 (finding class definition that included persons who lived in the United States who own a home in which the disputed product was installed after a particular date was not subjective or imprecise); Chavez v. [read post]