Search for: "Wilson v. Hand" Results 901 - 920 of 981
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2024, 7:33 am
On the one hand, it was grounded in reliance by the person or institution extending trust; that reliance included at its inception a connection to faith in character of the object of trust. [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Search engines The ICO has, since Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja Gonzalez (Case C-131/12) (‘Google Spain’) considered claims from data subjects about the lawfulness of the processing of their personal data by search engines. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It’s a thoroughgoing history of lawyers’ law, one that takes legal arguments in courtrooms deadly seriously, paying as much attention to litigation strategies and the plausible arguments that lost out as the official holdings handed down from the bench. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
v=p4uhOJH7d6o&feature=youtu.be, and detailed, relevant guidance from Jason Wilson, reflecting his extensive law publishing experience and obvious expertise. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 11:34 pm
Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun, who famously announced a similar reversal in his 1994 dissent from the Court's refusal to consider the relatively routine death penalty case of Callins v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
Hay v Cresswell [2023] EWHC 882 (KB) and Aaronson v Stones [2023] EWHC 2399 (KB) both centred on allegations, published online by the Defendants, that the Claimants had committed acts of sexual violence. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
The Tenure in Office Act was repealed in 1887, and in the case of Myers v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
On the other hand, in 2012, 11 substantive appeals in which leave to appeal had been given were allowed and 13 dismissed. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
As Lord Sumption explained (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Hodge and Briggs concurring) in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2020] AC 612, [2019] UKSC 27 (12 June 2019) [16], the main reason why harm which was less than “serious” had given rise to liability before the Act was that damage to reputation was presumed from the words alone and might therefore be very different from any damage which could be established in fact. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Too restrictive measures on extrajudicial activities carry the risk that judges will “lose contact with the world outside the court, which in turn will result in judicial short sightedness and unresponsiveness to the ever changing needs of society”.[90] On the other hand, permitting judges to freely engage in extrajudicial activities introduces the danger of weakening public confidence in the courts.[91] It also risks individuals believing that justice can be purchased.[92] The… [read post]