Search for: "Windsor v. State" Results 901 - 920 of 1,338
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2013, 6:12 pm
The case that made it to the Supreme Court which ultimately led to its overturning is United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:23 pm by Pamela Wolf
In a greatly anticipated and deeply divided opinion, the High Court ruled that lawfully married same-sex couples are entitled to the equal protection of the laws pursuant to the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, and thus, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) must fall (United States v Windsor, June 26, 2013, Kennedy, A). [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:23 pm by Pamela Wolf
In a greatly anticipated and deeply divided opinion, the High Court ruled that lawfully married same-sex couples are entitled to the equal protection of the laws pursuant to the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, and thus, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) must fall (United States v Windsor, June 26, 2013, Kennedy, A). [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:29 pm by Deborah Hellman
 What does Windsor thus portend for the constitutionality of state laws that restrict marriage to opposite sex couples? [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:55 am by immigrationprof
Over the next few days, we will feature a guest blog post written by various scholars on the impact of Windsor v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:58 am
Madison — as quoted in the DOMA case, United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:47 am by Joy Waltemath
In a greatly anticipated and deeply divided opinion, the Supreme Court ruled yesterday that lawfully married same-sex couples are entitled to the equal protection of the laws pursuant to the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution and, thus, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) must fall (United States v Windsor, June 26, 2013, Kennedy, A). [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:05 am
Windsor - The DOMA Case Now, let's look at United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 6:05 am by Staci Zaretsky
Tim Huelskamp, Roberta Kaplan, SCOTUS, Supreme Court, Tim Huelskamp, Windsor v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 5:19 am by Mark Graber
Am I the only one who thinks all nine justices collectively wrote both opinions in Hollingsworth v. [read post]