Search for: "Wise v. United States" Results 901 - 920 of 1,321
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2012, 6:01 am by Frank Pasquale
” By any measure, the United States is a constitutional republic in name only. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm by Frank Pasquale
” By any measure, the United States is a constitutional republic in name only. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 6:41 pm by Edward A. Fallone
  Judge Davis was wise to resist such a sweeping expansion of Equal Protection doctrine when he issued his earlier ruling, and he would be wise to reject such a novel theory if it were advanced again. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:24 pm by Sandy Levinson
The Founders in Philadelphia wisely [my emphasis] made it difficult to change this core document.... [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:43 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
Courts have split over the meaning of "lawfully made under this title," with some holding it means "legally manufactured... within the United States," CBS v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:12 am by Marissa Miller
At Cato@Liberty, Trevor Burrus predicts that the Court will summarily reverse the Montana Supreme Court’s recent decision upholding the state’s ban on independent expenditures by corporations – a ruling that Burrus calls an attempt to “nullify” Citizens United. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Milwaukeeans had to wait until December 12 to learn that the United States Supreme Court had denied the state’s petition for certiorari. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:14 am by WSLL
The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 1, § 11 of the Wyoming Constitution guarantee that a person will not be placed twice in jeopardy for the same criminal offense. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
The Constitution Bench's relevant observations are set out as under: "........A wise exercise of judicial power inevitably takes care of the evil conseq [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am by Kevin LaCroix
 However, last year, in an abrupt reversal, the United States Supreme Court dramatically limited the extraterritorial application of U.S. securities laws in Morrison v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:29 pm by Mack Sperling
§262 says that a joint owner of a patent  "may make, use, offer to sell, or sell the patented invention within the United States, or import the patented invention into the United States, without the consent of and without accounting to the other owners. [read post]