Search for: "v. Oliver" Results 901 - 920 of 2,026
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2016, 10:21 pm by Bill Marler
A. 6, 1964) KK 61-64 at 754 S. v. 40 Cases … Pinocchio Brand … Olive Oil 289 F. 2nd 343 (C. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:18 pm by CJLF Staff
  Richard Weizel of Reuters reports that last August, in the case of Santiago v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 7:07 am by SHG
Like many people who favor censorship but have a cookie-sheet-shallow grasp of its history, Valenti is misquoting Oliver Wendell Holmes dropping a rhetorical aside in Schenck v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 1:27 pm by Ken White
Like many people who favor censorship but have a cookie-sheet-shallow grasp of its history, Valenti is misquoting Oliver Wendell Holmes dropping a rhetorical aside in Schenck v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 2:02 pm
Commercial Tenant doesn't feel like paying Landlord rent, so stops doing so. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 74 [week ending on Sunday 29 November] –  Bob Marley copyright | Nintendo TPM triumphs in Italy | GIs and TMs in the EU | Prebalin again | YouTube will defend fair use | End-of-year reading |Stretchline Intellectual Properties Ltd v H&M Hennes & Mauritz UK Ltd | Goodbye from Jeremy, and thank you from us | Greekat on plain packaging | Rovi Guides Inc v Virgin Media Ltd &… [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 10:18 am by Justin A
Supreme Court issued its first decision of the October 2015 term, OBB Personenverkehr AG v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 73  [week ending on Sunday 22 November] –  Xmas present from Benelux PTO | Eponia never ending troubles |  Prof Dr Siegfried Broß v EPO | Protection of formats in the Netherlands | Eponia never ending proceedings | UK intensifies its Cracking Ideas programme | Anne Frank's Diary copyright | Transport for London and IP | CJEU in SBS Belgium v SABAM Case… [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 2:12 pm
 IVDP then appealed to the General Court on several grounds.The decisionIn Case T‑659/14 IVDP v OHIM (PORT CHARLOTTE) General Court held:“…it is clear that neither the provisions of Regulation No 491/2009, nor those of Regulation No 207/2009, state that the protection under the former must be construed as being exhaustive in the sense that that protection cannot be supplemented, beyond its particular scope, by another system of protection. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 2:38 am by Amy Howe
” A post at CrimProf Blog discusses an article on constitutional retroactivity – at issue in the case of Montgomery v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
 ****************** PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never Too Late 72 [week ending on Sunday 15 November] –  Merck Sharp & Dohme v Ono Pharmaceutical | Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd | Economics of internet trolls | UK IPO scammer scammed | Video conferencing at the EPO | Warner-Lambert v Pfizer in France | African Ministerial Conference in IP | Green claims and… [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:15 pm by Elim
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KD3989 .C52 2015Jeffrey Jowell, Dawn Oliver & Colm O’Cinneide, eds., The Changing Constitution, 8th ed. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:48 am by Jeremy
It dives into the history of the 1909 Copyright Act and the resulting Herbert v Shanley Co. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Weller v Associated Newspapers ([2015] EWCA Civ 1176) The Court of Appeal has upheld a High Court finding that the publishers of Mail Online infringed the privacy of three of Paul Weller’s children by publishing unpixellated pictures of them on a family shopping trip in Los Angeles. [read post]