Search for: "A P.2."
Results 9181 - 9200
of 26,631
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2022, 10:42 am
(App. at pp. 2, 10-12.) [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 9:39 am
Principle 2: Flexibility in Use [The design accommodates a wide range of individual preferences and abilities.] [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:49 am
Smack Apparel: P has sophisticated TM counsel and D doesn’t. [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:22 pm
” Dobbs §2.6(1), at 148, n. 2; see also Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
2. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 10:36 am
Love) (see item 2(A)) Northern District of Texas Miscellaneous Order No. 62 (Dallas Division, Patent Cases) (see item 2.1(a)(2)) Southern District of Texas Local Rules of Practice for Patent Cases (Corpus Christi Division) (see Rule 2-1(a)(2)) Court Procedures of District Judge Nancy F. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:46 am
2 The basic stock component may be reflected by the S&P 500 Index, or preferably, by a broader market proxy, such as the CRSP 1-10 Index. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 7:04 am
For the exception to apply in this case: (1) at least two-thirds of class members must have been citizens of New York; and (2) the “primary defendants” must have been citizens of New York. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:56 pm
FDA-2003-P-0003) and April 2004 (Docket No. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:14 pm
Peel County Board of Education, [1981] 2 S.C.R. 21, Bonnington Castings, Ltd. v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 4:18 pm
App. 3578, 249 P.3d 630 (2011). [2]6096 AMH ERIC H3472.1, 6096 AMS Bran Gorr 497, 6096 AMS HOBB s3030.1, 61st Leg., Reg. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:35 am
(In re Clark, supra, 5 Cal.4th at p. 767; In re Miller (1941) 17 Cal.2d 734, 735.) [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 5:40 am
Jeffrey P. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 2:33 am
The Commission clearly assumes that article 14 of Regulation Rome I leaves the matter to the autonomous conflict-rules of the Member States and has already expressed this view in its follow up-report under article 27 para. (2) of Regulation Rome I presented in 2016 (see COM(2016)626, p. 3). [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:04 pm
See id. at 2-4. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:04 pm
See id. at 2-4. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:34 pm
The current categories of applicants who can request premium processing service and the required filing fees are as follows: $2,500 if you are filing Form I-129 requesting E-1, E-2, E-3, H-1B, H-3, L (including blanket L-1), O, P, Q, or TN nonimmigrant classification. $1,500 if you are filing Form I-129 requesting H-2B or R nonimmigrant classification. $2,500 if you are filing Form I-140 requesting EB-1, EB-2, or EB-3 immigrant visa classification. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 12:36 pm
Love) (see item 2(A)) Northern District of Texas Miscellaneous Order No. 62 (Dallas Division, Patent Cases) (see item 2.1(a)(2)) Southern District of Texas Local Rules of Practice for Patent Cases (Corpus Christi Division) (see Rule 2-1(a)(2)) Court Procedures of District Judge Nancy F. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 10:24 am
The pinpoint citation in the P.3d portion will need to have the reporter page number. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:04 pm
See id. at 2-4. [read post]
