Search for: "BES v. State" Results 9181 - 9200 of 68,875
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It was legal for 48 years straight—from the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:27 pm by John Stigi and Eugene Choi
In United Food & Commercial Workers Union & Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm by Giles Peaker
Williams v Parmar & Ors (HOUSING – RENT REPAYMENT ORDER) (2021) UKUT 244 (LC) We knew that the Upper Tribunal has been itching to get an appeal on the approach to the assessment of the amount of a rent repayment order, ever since Ficcara v James, apparently being keen to make the point that ‘the full rent’ was not a starting point in the criminal sentencing sense, as it could not go up beyond that according to landlord conduct. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:16 am by Cinthia Macie
”  The FTC’s “Made in USA” labeling rule will prohibit marketers from using that designation unless “1) final assembly or processing of the product occurs in the United States; 2) all significant processing that goes into the product occurs in the United States; and 3) all or virtually all ingredients or components of the product are made and sourced in the United States. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 7:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Cuomo (2020) (Gorsuch, J., concurring) (stating that Jacobson essentially applied a rational basis standard); Harris v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
” That characterization ignored the ruling’s profound real-world effect, preventing 85%-90% of women from exercising their rights under Roe v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
United States A new privacy bill is pending in Massachusetts would be the most revolutionary data-privacy legislation in the United States. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 1:21 pm by Giles Peaker
In my judgment the reasoning of the House of Lords in Fahia (R v Harrow LBC, ex p Fahia(1998) 1 WLR 1396, HL) provides no basis for that contention, nor did the Court of Appeal in Begum (R. v. [read post]