Search for: "English v. English"
Results 9181 - 9200
of 11,202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2010, 12:24 pm
State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 8:08 am
A close analysis of five decisions is crucial for this exercise – the oft-quoted judgment of the Supreme Court in VB Rangaraj v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 1:06 am
Hamptons International Dubai LLC & anr v Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors heard 23 July 2010 (Eady J) Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson) BBC v HarperCollins, heard 31 August and 1 September 2010 (Morgan J) [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:44 pm
Today's opinion from the 7th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 2:02 am
EEOC v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 7:04 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 6:28 am
Recently, the size of judgments in the English courts has been steadily creeping up and they have now reached somewhat obese proportions. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 10:55 am
In Stephens v Avery ([1988] 1 Ch. 449) this protection was applied to lesbian relationships and in Barrymore v Newsgroup ([1997] FSR 600) to homosexual relationships. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 6:30 am
In the recent cybersquatting case of Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. ll aka Joe Comeau FA1336979 (Nat. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 9:35 am
Devine recently illustrated these principles in Daston Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 12:13 am
The first of these arguments had been considered and rejected by the Supreme Court in State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 12:02 am
The English abstract reads: Last-born among European Union Private International Law, the « Rome I » Regulation establishes rules concerning the law applicable to contracts. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:55 am
Senehi v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 10:43 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 8:47 pm
The court decided that agendas, contemporaneous notes, and summaries in English were not necessarily sufficient substitutes for a sign language interpreter. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 6:31 am
In Martin v. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 5:02 am
In such a case, the dispute would be brought before the central division of the PC Court of First Instance, and the language of the proceedings would be that of the patent, namely German, English or French. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 12:50 am
Reliance was placed on the English first instance decision of Davidson v Barclays Bank ([1940] 1 All ER 316) in which it was held that the principles of qualified privilege were not engaged in respect of a communication of a notice of dishonour. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:29 am
Supreme Court Decision, Lingle v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 2:30 am
August is a quiet month in English courts and in those of most other jurisdictions. [read post]
