Search for: "House v. House" Results 9181 - 9200 of 41,245
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2009, 3:45 pm by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
The bill, which has a companion in the Michigan House, has been referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 8:00 am
As the California Supreme Court pointed out in the leading case on the issue, Yanowitz v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
House (215 Rs + 12 Ds) passes HR 620, ADA Education and Reform Act, aimed at curbing drive-by lawsuits by giving owners a chance to fix before being liable. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 10:00 am
For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matos v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 5:33 am by Patrick Bracher
(Bioscience West Inc. v Gulfstream Property and Casualty Insurance Co., case number 2D14-3946, in the District Court of  Appeal of Florida, Second District) [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 7:59 am by Andrew Hamm
Briefly: For the Northwestern University Law Review Online, Joseph Blocher considers arguments for and against the constitutionality of the death penalty expressed in the Justices’ various opinions last year in Glossip v. [read post]
Ali Kasikci — a perfectionist’s never-ending efforts Yes, I am talking the legendary Ali V. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 7:43 am
 In May 2007, the Court ruled in Ledbetter v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:15 pm by Patricia Salkin
AMCAL Chico LLC v Chico Unified School District, 2020 WL 6498638 (CA App. 11/5/2020) [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
White House warns Congress to not delay TPP deal https://t.co/Fi0J7hTgnj -> Investor State Dispute Settlement – a critical tool in the international investment toolkit https://t.co/B5IkD5xVfP -> Court Enters Final Dismissal of “Monkey Selfie” Case https://t.co/UEUXDP80EE -> Balancing Copyright Owners' Rights With ISP Immunities https://t.co/ltkWWYfi1n -> The Higher Regional Court in Munich decides that licensing duties lie with the uploaders, not YouTube… [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 1:45 am
  In his own words, the Bill will: amend the Law of Property Act 1925 to require a mortgagee to obtain the court's permission before exercising the power of sale, where the mortgaged land consists of or includes a dwelling-house The aim is to overturn the High Court’s decision in Horsham Properties v Clark [2008] EWHC 2327 (Ch). [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:32 pm by Enterprise Consultants Group
This bill would provide same-sex couples, who married before the Supreme Court’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]