Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 9181 - 9200 of 18,118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2017, 8:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the symposium from the McGill Law Journal: Indigenous Law and Legal Pluralism ARTICLES 0 Introduction: Moving from the Why to the How of Indigenous Law Fraser Harland 721 0 An Inside Job: Engaging with Indigenous Legal Traditions through Stories Val Napoleon and Hadley Friedland 725 0 WSÁNEĆ Legal Theory and the Fuel Spill at SELEKTEL (Goldstream River) Robert YELḰÁTTE Clifford 755 0 Heroes, Tricksters, Monsters, and Caretakers: Indigenous Law and Legal… [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm by Matthew Hill
This, it is argued, represents a welcome re-assertion of the fundamental importance of the notion that the Convention gives rights to individuals, and imposes obligations on state agencies to meet them. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 5:30 am by Jeff Gamso
Justice Stevens provided the moment last week during argument in Magwood v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 1:58 am
If you're planning to enter, you've still got plenty of time - the closing date is 5 February 2007. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 4:44 am by Betty Lupinacci
  Justice Earl Warren wrote in Braunfeld v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 6:41 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Although defendant's contention that the indictment was duplicitous on its face is not preserved for our review (see People v Becoats, 17 NY3d 643, 650-651), we nevertheless exercise our power to review it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see People v Bracewell, 34 AD3d 1197, 1198). .. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:10 pm by Kristin Michelle Ekert
“For the many, many non-citizens caught up in the American criminal justice system, there’s a very important point of making sure they know what they’re getting into,” says Professor Stephanos Bibas. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm by Dani Selby
In 2016, Swarns served as lead counsel for Buck, arguing Buck v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 4:40 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The case was South Carolina v. [read post]