Search for: "Level v. State" Results 9181 - 9200 of 29,836
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2018, 1:15 pm
In these cases, too, the state belatedly disclosed the prosecution’s notes in the capital trials. [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:55 am by Terry Hart
In doing so, it avoids any takings issues by providing roughly the same right at the federal level that it preempts at the state level (albeit with more uniformity and certainty, improving things for recording artists and sound recording users). [read post]
29 May 2018, 10:19 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Davis, which held that lawyers' ineffective work on state habeas proceedings did not excuse a procedural default because there's no constitutional right to counsel in state habeas proceedings. [read post]
29 May 2018, 8:28 am by Joseph Fishkin
In Evenwel, the plaintiffs’ claim was that only voters, rather than all persons, should count for purposes of districting (at the state level). [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:42 am by Peter Mahler
None of the correspondence explicitly referred to the mediation as binding, as stated in Section 3.3.3. [read post]
28 May 2018, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
  Since then, there has been another substantial award of A$2.623m in Rayney v State of Western Australia [2017] WASC 367 and a claim for A$4.8m made in Wagner v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd, with the trial currently being heard. [read post]
Courts in New York did not enforce non-compete agreements against employees that were involuntarily terminated as part of a plant closure (SIFCO Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 3:01 am
 He demonstrated the disparity in the qualification of trade secrets that fundamentally, at national level, most Member States do not consider trade secrets to be IP rights, except Italy, Spain, Latvia and Slovakia. [read post]
25 May 2018, 12:21 pm by Kelsey Farish
The answer, at Federal District level in the United States at least, is "maybe".In May 2012, stock images company DRK Photo sued textbook publishing giant McGraw-Hill for alleged copyright infringement. [read post]
25 May 2018, 10:03 am by Scott R. Anderson
Thus it presumably authorizes the same scope of activities, which the Supreme Court found to include law of war detention in Hamdi v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:30 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
(Privacy Shield is functionally an adequacy assurance, or an assurance that the U.S. provides an adequate level of protection for that data under Chapter V of the GDPR). [read post]
24 May 2018, 1:13 pm by Deepak Gupta
(In addition, as Daniel Hemel recently observed, there are some limited tools that can be employed at the state and local level, like disclosure requirements and the use of market power to police government contractors.) [read post]
24 May 2018, 6:59 am by rachel@masslomap.org
STANDARD DEDUCTION v ITEMIZED DEDUCTION Can we still itemize and can still deduct . . . ? [read post]