Search for: "Levell v. State" Results 9181 - 9200 of 29,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2014, 9:21 am by Giles Peaker
The DWP has issued a circular in the wake of the Court of Appeal judgment in MA & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2014] EWCA Civ 13 (Our report coming soon, honest). [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 2:15 pm
  At paragraph 67, the Court states: In our view, actual, substantial, physical damage to the land in the context of this case refers to nickel levels that at least posed some risk to the health or wellbeing of the residents of those properties. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday, the court heard arguments in State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:24 am by Kali Borkoski
This is a significant level because the 50% mark appears to hold some significance for Justice Kennedy. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 3:33 pm by Giles Peaker
Further, while child related benefits might be ‘designed to meet the needs of the child’ (R (SG and Others)) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [ 2015 ] UKSC 16 ), this could include the child’s housing costs. [read post]
Ortovox v Mammut  The UPC also considered the role of protective letters in Ortovox Sportartikel GmbH v Mammut Sports Group AG, Mammut Sports Group GmbH (“Ortovox v Mammut”). [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 12:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"Generally, a claimant who voluntarily withdraws from the labor market by retiring is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits unless the claimant's disability caused or contributed to the retirement" (Matter of Losquadro v Nassau County Police Dept., 225 AD3d 1083, 1084 [3d Dept 2024] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048-1049 [3d Dept 2024]; Matter of… [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 12:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"Generally, a claimant who voluntarily withdraws from the labor market by retiring is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits unless the claimant's disability caused or contributed to the retirement" (Matter of Losquadro v Nassau County Police Dept., 225 AD3d 1083, 1084 [3d Dept 2024] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048-1049 [3d Dept 2024]; Matter of… [read post]