Search for: "Levell v. State"
Results 9181 - 9200
of 29,841
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2018, 3:42 am
None of the correspondence explicitly referred to the mediation as binding, as stated in Section 3.3.3. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:00 am
In Laborers’ Local #231 Pension Fund v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 4:51 pm
Since then, there has been another substantial award of A$2.623m in Rayney v State of Western Australia [2017] WASC 367 and a claim for A$4.8m made in Wagner v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd, with the trial currently being heard. [read post]
28 May 2018, 5:54 am
Courts in New York did not enforce non-compete agreements against employees that were involuntarily terminated as part of a plant closure (SIFCO Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 1:17 pm
Although Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 8:16 am
Kitsap Co., 219 P.3d 675 (Wash., 2009), and State v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 3:01 am
He demonstrated the disparity in the qualification of trade secrets that fundamentally, at national level, most Member States do not consider trade secrets to be IP rights, except Italy, Spain, Latvia and Slovakia. [read post]
25 May 2018, 12:21 pm
The answer, at Federal District level in the United States at least, is "maybe".In May 2012, stock images company DRK Photo sued textbook publishing giant McGraw-Hill for alleged copyright infringement. [read post]
25 May 2018, 10:03 am
Thus it presumably authorizes the same scope of activities, which the Supreme Court found to include law of war detention in Hamdi v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:30 am
(Privacy Shield is functionally an adequacy assurance, or an assurance that the U.S. provides an adequate level of protection for that data under Chapter V of the GDPR). [read post]
24 May 2018, 2:11 pm
Texas v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 1:13 pm
(In addition, as Daniel Hemel recently observed, there are some limited tools that can be employed at the state and local level, like disclosure requirements and the use of market power to police government contractors.) [read post]
24 May 2018, 7:03 am
You would have had to wait until 1967, in Katz v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 6:59 am
STANDARD DEDUCTION v ITEMIZED DEDUCTION Can we still itemize and can still deduct . . . ? [read post]
24 May 2018, 5:57 am
. *** Case Background In EEOC v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 5:11 pm
United States 17-1516 Issues: (1) Whether the Supreme Court’s prior precedent applying the discretionary-function exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act to government employees acting on the operational level should be modified to accord with Justice Scalia’s concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 10:25 am
Asked about scenarios in which the United States faced a conventional military threat, respondents were substantially less likely to perceive U.S. use of nuclear weapons as justified compared to the use of conventional military force, no matter the level of imminence. [read post]
23 May 2018, 9:57 am
The stated purpose of the new law is to give people more control over their personal data and make it easier to access it. [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:12 am
United States v. [read post]
