Search for: "People v Levelle"
Results 9181 - 9200
of 12,302
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
The latter was effective at getting public notice although ineffective at any other goal: the laws passed generally put people out of jobs, reduced tax revenue, and didn't level the playing field. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:25 am
Hutchison v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:01 pm
At one level, this must sound crazy, not to mention somewhat arrogant. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 1:38 pm
Justice Breyer was particularly keen on this, and suggested at one point that maybe the Court could rule that this particular level of surveillance certainly crossed the line and required a warrant, and leave it to Congress and the legislatures of the states to draw the line about the particular circumstances in which warrants would be required in other instances.The traditional liberal/conservative split on the Court might break down on this issue, as it did in Kyllo v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:48 pm
And, although I hoped against hope that Judge Silberman was not telegraphing his position when he strongly asserted that the “logic” of Wickard v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 10:25 am
We, the undersigned lawyers, call upon States, on behalf of the people they represent, to make the 2012 Rio+20 Conference a decisive moment toward the common future of humanity and ecosystems. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 10:06 am
This is why people don’t like lawyers). [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:46 am
This third method of proving DUI was recently addressed by the Illinois Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:05 am
In addition to the great experience he offers associates, he takes the time to get to know the associates with whom he works on a personal level. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:54 am
From an efficiency perspective, we’re indifferent at a static level. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:37 am
In Gillan v The Commissioner [2006] 2 AC 307 Lord Bingham expressed his doubts that an “ordinary superficial search of the person” can be said to show a lack of respect for private life: intrusions must reach a certain level of seriousness to engage the operation of the Convention, which is, after all, concerned with human rights and fundamental freedoms, and I incline to the view that an ordinary superficial search of the person and an opening of bags, of the kind to… [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:19 am
State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:56 am
The need to accept such upsets rather than seek redress in tort is what I take the Court of Appeal to be expressing in its quote from Vanek v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Ricci v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 7:09 pm
People v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:04 am
“I didn’t want to be any part of these nasty people,” Ms. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 3:01 am
The court also ruled in 1985 that the term visibly intoxicated refers to people intoxicated by controlled substances, alcohol or both in Blunt v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
I mean, I know the word “transparent” is way beyond the vocabulary of these people, and now I find out “independent” is as well. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm
., v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Dukes, and Turner v. [read post]
