Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 9181 - 9200
of 9,857
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2022, 4:12 am
” Harvard Law School professor Jack Goldsmith and University of Arizona law professor Andrew Keane Woods have called for Chinese-style censorship of the internet, stating that “China was largely right and the United States was largely wrong. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:22 pm
The EAJA provided that a party prevailing against the United States could get attorney's fees unless the position of the United States was "substantially justified. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 10:22 am
The argument that the United States made is: “Look, to the extent that Idaho doesn’t allow doctors to provide the kind of stabilizing care that EMTALA requires them to provide, the federal statute trumps the state law, and the Idaho law has to fall. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
Some states have alleged that ICSID is biased, withdrawn from the ICSID Convention, and advocated creating alternative arbitration systems. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:32 am
Also to be considered are the related issues of the exclusionary rule and modern developments under the Roberts Court in the law of police interrogation. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
Justice Ginsburg went right at it by saying to Solicitor General of the United States Donald Verrilli... [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
” That characterization ignored the ruling’s profound real-world effect, preventing 85%-90% of women from exercising their rights under Roe v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:41 pm
So, I contacted the lawyer representing the Machinists, Robert Kenney. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 7:32 am
The Supreme Court has held that Morrison v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:47 am
Although it did not come out really plainly in the argument, the Court did seem to sense that there were greater risks to cellphone privacy in the case of a modern smartphone — the kind of device involved in Riley — and a somewhat dated model, the “flip phone,” which is the device at issue in the second case Tuesday, United States v Wurie. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:38 am
United States, in which the court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense, observing that because “Dean seems to me to be a substantive ruling that applies retroactively,” there will likely “be many more than just a handful of ‘Dean resentencing’ efforts. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 6:43 am
In Washington Alliance of Technology Workers v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 7:08 am
” Before diving into the court’s opinion in George v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:14 am
See Roberts v. the People of the United States National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 3:31 pm
Another precedent that some of his critics said might be vulnerable is United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:13 pm
United States, a case that for the first time declared a right of privacy in the conversation that an individual has in a public telephone booth. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:11 am
Eason, and Robert J. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
Finally, sometimes just the risk of suspension may pressure politicians and other speakers to avoid taking positions a company dislikes, as Justice Stevens warned about in Citizens United.[74] To be sure, being banned by Twitter and Facebook might in some situations be good publicity, especially if one is trying to make a name for oneself: It's still rare enough to be a news story. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 11:18 am
And although the government did not get what it asked for substantively when the Supreme Court issued its interim ruling on June 26 (with a majority leaving the injunctions in place as applied to those with a “bona fide connection” to the United States), it got exactly what it asked for procedurally. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 11:48 am
The opposite was true in the United States, as Kahn Freund would often say. [read post]
