Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 9181 - 9200
of 17,260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2015, 5:31 am
Hollander v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:18 am
But, I bet you wouldn’t anticipate what allegedly happened in Lazette v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 4:28 am
Harnish v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 4:17 am
Lee v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 7:45 am
Both sides in the NJ voting-machines lawsuit, Gusciora v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 3:50 pm
Plaintiffs’ petition included three causes of action: Count I alleged inverse condemnation under Missouri state law, Count II asserted inverse condemnation under the U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm
The Austin-based federal Western District Court for Texas “finds the United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:48 am
See page 2 of the 2011 proxy statement (non-votes count as "no" votes) v. page 2 of the 2012 proxy statement (non-votes don't even count as being present at the meeting). [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 6:07 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., represents the petitioners in Kirby v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:18 am
Supreme Court’s June 2000 decision in Dickerson v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 12:33 pm
The Eleventh Circuit also pointed to its 2011 decision in U.S. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
In the 1996 case of Romer v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 9:48 am
Garman v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:26 am
The intent and purpose of the 1999 Order was set out effectively in R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, Ex Parte Spath Holme Limited which was referred to in the instant case. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:26 am
The intent and purpose of the 1999 Order was set out effectively in R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, Ex Parte Spath Holme Limited which was referred to in the instant case. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:03 am
Though the article is set to appear in print sometime this month, it might not beat the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 7:18 am
See United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 3:56 pm
Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm
The United States Attorney did not want the death penalty. [read post]
