Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 9181 - 9200
of 15,310
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2013, 1:33 pm
The warning of the overly aggressive characterization of certain arrangements as fixed indemnity coverage exempt from HIPAA and ACA mandates comes with acknowledgement that legitimate fixed indemnity coverage under a group health plan that actually meets the conditions outlined in 26 CFR 54.9831-1(c)(4), 29 CFR 732(c)(4), 45 CFR 146.145(c)(4) are exempt from the obligation to comply with the ACA and HIPAA portability mandates of title XXVI of the PHS Act, part 7 of ERISA… [read post]
26 May 2013, 3:05 am
” 2). b). [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:35 am
Section 332(c)(7)(B)(ii) explicitly supplants state authority by requiring zoning authorities to render a decision “within a reasonable period of time,” and the meaning of that phrase is indisputably a question of federal law. [read post]
24 May 2013, 5:13 am
The opinion notes that [b]y the time the motion was heard, only the subpoena served on one of the ISPs, Verizon Communications, remained active. [read post]
23 May 2013, 11:44 am
In Roberts v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 10:06 am
Defendants moving to dismiss a suit by reason of qualified immunity would in almost all cases be well advised to move for summary judgment, rather than for dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) or 12(c). [read post]
22 May 2013, 9:05 am
City of Arlington v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 9:05 am
City of Arlington v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 9:05 am
City of Arlington v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:24 am
Court of Appeals follows its January 25, 2013 (Noel Canning v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:56 am
JAR Laboratories LLC v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:00 am
A blue-sky overhaul could consider whether and how to distinguish surveillance based on the consent of one or all parties to a communication or other form of collected information.[15] B. [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:23 am
The nongovernmental organisations which are signatories to the Joint Memorandum of Understanding on Fire and Building Safety (dated March 15, 2012), having stated their intention to support the implementation of this programme, shall, at their own election, be signed witnesses to this Agreement. [read post]
18 May 2013, 7:12 am
S. [read post]
17 May 2013, 10:15 am
Resources Code, § 21177(a),(b); see Galante Vineyards v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 8:00 am
Dan’s City maintains that because §13102(23)(B)’s definition of “transportation” includes “storage” and “handling,” Pelkey’s claims fall within §14501(c)(1)’s preemptive ambit. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:53 am
§ 2000aa(c). [read post]
14 May 2013, 6:07 am
” Neal v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 5:07 am
” Neal v. [read post]
11 May 2013, 10:35 pm
The plaintiff’s primary grievance was with regard to the content of the advertisement that allegedly stated the following – "Fortune RBO oil as being, (a) the "healthiest oil in the world"; (b) healthier than the other cooking oils shown in the advertisements (in the TV commercial, though the trademark of the plaintiff was not used, comparison was made with the container of the plaintiff’s product. [read post]
