Search for: "State v. Congress" Results 9181 - 9200 of 29,298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Authority of an employer to prohibit an employee's legal use of marijuana as permitted by state lawLance Carlson v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 9:45 pm by Sarah Madigan
City of Denver and Bi-Metallic Investment Company v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 8:12 am by Howard M. Wasserman
Anyone who believes civil procedure is not funny should read the transcript of Tuesday’s argument in Nutraceutical Corp. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
Today the justices will hear oral argument in Timbs v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 2:53 am by Walter Olson
” [John Kenneth Ross, IJ “Short Circuit,” on Code Revision Commission v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 11:22 am by Mary Whisner
Law Week—October 2018 and found this:Criminal Law  Case: United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 9:30 am by Ronald Mann
Next Tuesday’s argument in Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
Murphy, a capital case in which the justices will decide whether Congress has disestablished the boundaries of an Indian reservation in Oklahoma, affecting the state’s ability to prosecute major crimes in the affected area. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 3:09 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The Court has, however, reviewed the record and takes particular note of the recent orders issued by the United States Supreme Court on July 30, 2018, and November 2, 2018, as well as the extraordinary Order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 12:51 pm by Amy Howe
First, Congress created the triple-damages remedy to deter antitrust violations “just like this one. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:46 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 5:01 am by Kate Fort
Ed. 2d 561 (1963) (noting that Acts of Congress have “strong presumptive validity’); State v. [read post]