Search for: "State v. Register" Results 9181 - 9200 of 13,703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2017, 2:47 am
As stated above, section 80 of the Patents Act does not make any reference to the court. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 7:19 am
The General Court affirmed that the ORO marks could not be said to be scarcely distinctive, and Case T-344/03 Saiwa v OHIM-Barilla Alimentare (SELEZIONE ORO BARILLA could not be said to have established a precedent. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 4:27 pm
Washington State start-up NautiGirl received a trade mark cancellation notice from global lifestyle apparel house Nautica and its parent, VF Corp. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 2:04 am by Giorgio Luceri
GuestKat Tian Lu discussed background of the case and provided a comment on the outcome of the decision and the assessment of deceptiveness of marks in light with the Trade Mark Law of China (TMLC) (see here).GuestKat Hayleigh Bosher reported on the case of the company Fizzy Foam, a trade mark owner that surrendered some of its registered marks, even though they were accepted by the UKIPO after receiving reactions on the Internet and a petition against their registrations… [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 10:18 am by Victoria Clark
Eliot Kim summarized the latest Foreign Intelligence Sovereign Immunities Act case: Jam v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:11 am by Jani Ihalainen
They can be registered just as well, just not applied to tobacco products. [read post]