Search for: "Superior Court of California"
Results 9181 - 9200
of 10,172
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2008, 4:48 am
The Dept. of Fair Housing took the case, and pushed it through the appeals court (even though they lost at the Superior Court) and won. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 12:38 am
Superior Court judge -- chose not to test Duncan's blood. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 8:35 pm
Superior Court (1989) 216 Cal.App.3d 813 and its limited progeny, some Courts of Appeal have determined that the acceptance of a 998 offer on a cross-complaint, and resulting dismissal with prejudice, may act as a retraxit, providing a basis for a summary judgment motion against the affirmative defenses asserted by the defendant/cross-complainant. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 11:50 am
The Arkansas Supreme Court recognized that other courts have held that choice-of-law “is crucial in making a class-certification decision,” id., at 8 (citation omitted), and indeed cited cases from California, New Jersey and Texas to that effect, see id., at 8-9. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:38 pm
Now, in an Alameda County Superior Court, attorney will present opening arguments as Verizon goes on trial in the second of four coordinated class actions against cell phone companies. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 3:04 am
The Superior Court of Los Angeles, the case examining the circumstances under which parents can homeschool their children, will be re-argued in the... [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 10:32 pm
* The Wage Law blog asserts that Bay Area superior court judges are developing a reputation for rejecting "claims made" settlements of wage-and-hour cases. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 12:21 am
California. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 12:43 am
Although it sounds a little bit like hearsay (or maybe just protection of confidential sources), Wage Law is reporting that some Superior Court judges, particularly in the Bay Area, believe that a "claims made" class action settlement should never be approved in a wage & hour case. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 9:40 am
" Plaintiff filed an action in the Superior Court of the State of California, Count of Ventura, seeking, among other things, a judgment of possession against Gerz. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 11:12 pm
In San Diego, both same sex and opposite sex couples will go to the San Diego Superior Court for their marriage. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 7:41 pm
Retired Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Eli Chernow worked with Pike when Pike was a commissioner, from 1973 to the mid-1990s. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 4:35 pm
Accordingly, we remand to the district court with instructions to grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus and to return the case to the San Joaquin County Superior Court to reduce Belmontes's sentence to life without parole, unless the State pursues a new sentencing proceeding within a reasonable amount of time, as determined by the district court. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 6:24 am
In order to convice the trial court that a class action is superior, the plaintiff probably needs to explain the manner in which class claims would be established. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 1:39 am
Orange County Superior Court Judge John Nho Trong recently lowered the charges saying he was not satisfied with the evidence in the case and that the Westminster Animal Control should have cited Moody more often. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:53 pm
Here's a new Complaint, this one filed by one Maria Jones in Alameda Superior state court, also against DineEquity, the owner of Applebee's, and otherwise identical to Ms. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:48 pm
The court said: The apparent premise for this approach is the plaintiff’s assumption that an alternative which is superior only in some respects to the project cannot satisfy the alternatives analysis reasonable range requirement. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 11:00 pm
We've been told that there are several Superior Court judges, particularly in the Bay Area, who believe that a so-called "claims made" class action settlement should never be approved in a wage & hour case. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 6:58 pm
A ruling yesterday by Providence, Rhode Island, Superior Court Justice Patricia A. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 6:00 pm
” The Cypress court also noted that trade secret owners have an incentive under the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“CUTSA”) to put good-faith third parties on notice. [read post]
