Search for: "Level v. State"
Results 9201 - 9220
of 29,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2015, 10:21 am
Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Mach Mining, LLC v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 3:13 pm
Costco claimed that it could not be liable for the refusal of a low level employee to modify its supposed policies, but the Court found no such limit in the ADA. [read post]
26 May 2018, 3:01 am
He demonstrated the disparity in the qualification of trade secrets that fundamentally, at national level, most Member States do not consider trade secrets to be IP rights, except Italy, Spain, Latvia and Slovakia. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 5:08 am
Yesterday, I discussed the Connecticut Supreme Court's decision in Ziotas v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 5:22 pm
Griem v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:04 am
Witkowski v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 2:07 pm
On September 10, 2009, the Michigan Court of Appeals released its published decision on reconsideration in People v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:45 pm
Hemphill v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 10:17 am
Division of Youth and Family Services v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:25 pm
This needed behavioral shift has taken a toll on the United States economy, with national unemployment claims reaching historic levels. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:22 am
Dec. 6, 2010) (jobs with a reasoning level of 3 are unsuitable for someone limited to "simple, repetitive tasks"); Burns v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm
Sheridan v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:54 pm
Doe v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:01 pm
UK decision actually states in full [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
Diaz, No. 08-1575 A sentence pursuant to a guilty plea to knowingly possessing methamphetamine with intent to distribute is affirmed where, because the decision to depart by levels is discretionary, the district court's decision to select the higher of two levels that encompassed the mandatory minimum sentence was procedural error.. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 10:02 am
In Pruitt v. [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 10:46 pm
City and County of Honolulu, 124 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. 1997)) and state courts (Richardson v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
