Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 9201 - 9220
of 9,600
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
However, denial of one petition is reversed where the state court's lack of notification and petitioner's prompt filing after receiving a response to his inquiry to the state court justified tolling. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 3:40 am
The first, a case involving the Army's prohibition on the use of doctors [and others] on court-martial panels in AR 27-10, was predicted by our house psychic, Grover the Magnificent, here:United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 2:09 pm
Selya says it is okay under prejudice and notes that under United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 9:11 am
Raich, supra, 545 U.S. 1, 26-29; United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 12:26 pm
My brother’s a doctor in Seattle. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 3:00 am
During the February Session, the New York Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments in Ramos v. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 7:38 am
Calder v. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 7:20 am
The Oregon Supreme Court addressed this question in James Boldt v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 4:48 pm
The California Supreme Court decided Ross v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 12:35 am
In Rikabi v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 5:40 pm
WeidemanEarlier today the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Ross v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 3:24 pm
Well, the California Supreme Court finally released its opinion in Ross v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 1:45 pm
In their fuller examination of Baze v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 12:25 pm
The Wyeth v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 11:03 am
Supreme Court in Baze v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 12:43 pm
Alexander v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 12:28 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice
'Han' Ruling Means That Statute is Constitutional Under Both First Amendment, Commerce Clause
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 3:57 am
Wade or Carhart v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 1:04 am
This bill is in response to the Supreme Court decision in Alcoy v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 3:40 am
United States v. [read post]