Search for: "State v. Downs" Results 9201 - 9220 of 40,863
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2017, 11:25 pm
In referring the question on Art 3(a) as to what was required for a product to be protected by a basic patent, he stated that he was “encouraged by what the [CJEU] said in Actavis v Sanofi and Actavis v Boehringer to believe that there is a realistic prospect of the Court providing further and better guidance to that which it has hitherto provided” (para 91). [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:52 pm by Ilya Somin
Hardwick helped set the stage for Lawrence v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:57 am by CMS
” The SIA, s 1, sets down the general principle that a State is immune from the jurisdiction of the courts of the UK subject to certain exceptions, including those in SIA, s 10. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am by John Elwood
United States, 18-7739. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 8:54 pm by Ray Giblett (AU) and Timothy Chan (AU)
Another COVID-19 insurance case comes to a close, at least for now, with the Full Federal Court handing down its decision in Star Entertainment Group Limited v Chubb Insurance Australia Ltd [2022] FCAFC 16. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 11:30 am
"And he agrees with my arguments about lifestyle choices, as well:"Diet and lack of exercise also bring down average life expectancy. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
On Thursday 24 October 2019, Mr Justice Warby heard both parties’ submissions in relation to these issues and judgment was handed down on Monday 4 November 2019. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm by familoo
However, caselaw confirms that welfare is still ‘a primary consideration’ (ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 2 AC 166, [2011] UKSC 4), so it’s going to be a pretty important factor in any consideration of publication, and in many cases it will be determinative. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am by Blog Editorial
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:27 pm
" This sad case reminds me of another case I wrote about in last year's municipal liability outline, Garner v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 3:41 pm by mdkeenan
Instead, the State must show that you failed to slow down as necessary to avoid the collision. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 9:01 am by Venkat Balasubramani
“Once it has opened a limited forum … the State must respect the lawful boundaries it has itself set. [read post]