Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 9201 - 9220
of 28,238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2017, 8:50 pm
Utah v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
See Dulong v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:05 am
Additional Resources: Johnson v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 5:46 am
Reybold Gp. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:10 am
In Vandyke v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 2:48 am
In Watts v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 1:21 pm
Harman v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:57 am
is owed to an interpretation of language prohibiting billboards that display “flashing,” “intermittent,” or “moving” lights, contained in agreements between the Federal Highway Administration and individual states, as announced in a guidance memorandum issued by the FHWA on September 25, 2007, or whether deference, if any, is owed under Skidmore v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:54 am
The pun seems inevitable: In Wednesday morning’s oral argument in Class v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am
This case involves the FHWA’s interpretation of common language in such federal-state agreements prohibiting signs illuminated by “flashing,” “intermittent,” and “moving” lights. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am
” Thus, as the Solicitor General explainedto the Supreme Court in the recent United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 8:06 pm
By Joseph Jones and Ruth Scoles Mitchell On October 3, 2017, the Irish High Court referred Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited [2016 No. 4809 P.] to the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”). [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 3:59 pm
The regime complex includes a wide range of regulations and institutions, from the hard law global and regional organizations have adopted (such as the UN, the EU, and the WTO) to soft law initiatives groups of states (such as the OECD’s guidelines on conflict minerals and human rights) and private bodies (such as the codes of conduct adopted by individual corporations or transnational business associations) have undertaken. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 3:12 pm
See State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 11:16 am
The State has made a very attractive offer of ten years deferred adjudication. [read post]
State v. Huey: Repeatedly Insinuating that the Defendant Was a Liar Was Improper but Not Prejudicial
3 Oct 2017, 11:13 am
” State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 8:28 am
United States and Ortiz v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:32 am
In Beard v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
Adams v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:59 pm
The appeals court affirmed, addressing only three of the issues raised by Goodman: (1) whether the State prematurely released his vehicle after his first trial in violation of his due process rights and requiring dismissal under California v. [read post]
