Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 9201 - 9220
of 29,602
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2021, 12:28 pm
Pursuant to the NY HERO Act’s directives, the New York State Department of Labor (NYSDOL), in conjunction with the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH), developed an Airborne Infectious Disease Exposure Prevention Standard, a Model Airborne Infectious Disease Exposure Prevention Plan, and various industry-specific model plans for the prevention of airborne infectious diseases. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 9:11 am
New Jersey v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 1:14 pm
The case is 134 Original, New Jersey v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:55 am
JP v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 7:59 am
In State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 12:01 am
Henry v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 8:33 am
Under this plan no state loses its current Electoral College benefits while all the states gain more attention of presidential candidates. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
In Huckaby v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
In Huckaby v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 9:23 am
As Lord Evershed M.R. stated in Zamet v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 6:36 am
[Estate of Ostlund v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 6:45 am
Static Control Components and United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 4:34 am
United States, which asks when erroneous applications of the U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 4:53 am
United States and Zivotofsky v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:53 pm
Ogman, No. 06-0203 "A sentence for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute and possession with intent to distribute cocaine base is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in considering both convictions in sentencing defendant; and 2) the decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:51 pm
The United States Supreme Court should do the same. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:55 pm
(f) Develop and implement an action plan, in accordance with the National Security Presidential Memorandum of February 11, 2019 (Protecting the United States Advantage in Artificial Intelligence and Related Critical Technologies) (the NSPM) to protect the advantage of the United States in AI and technology critical to United States economic and national security interests against strategic competitors and foreign adversaries. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 12:24 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEmployment
Court Deems Expert Qualified to Report, Testify In ERISA Challenge Over Health Plan Payments
Mahoney v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 8:51 am
The PACER records of USA v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:15 am
Public-sector employers and unions anxiously await the outcome of Janus v. [read post]
