Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 9201 - 9220
of 9,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2008, 11:08 am
In Canada v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:53 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
The response explained the late filing of the answer by stating that, on the day the answer was due, Respondents' counsel was delayed in returning to his office from a hearing. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
Leaving his support order at the current level through Clark's incarceration would build a high arrearage burdening Clark's re-entry into the community upon his release. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:19 pm
Since that time almost every major military ally of the United States has revised its policy to allow openly-gay service members, but the political will to change the policy in this country has been lacking. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:18 pm
The turbulence increased dramatically yesterday as a result of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Engquist v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 1:21 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 3:13 pm
Id. at 5 (citing United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 11:55 am
Since the Iowa Department of Corrections has now terminated its contract with InnerChange, the program has ceased operation in Iowa, and InnerChange has paid back to the state all funds that the court had ordered it to return, in April the defendants in the case asked the federal district court to dissolve the injunction that had been issued.In Americans United for Separation of Church & State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:53 am
Nowhere in the complaint does the plaintiff allege, at a minimum, conduct by the college "acting under color of law which deprived the injured party of a right, privilege or immunity guaranteed by the Constitution or the laws of the United States" (DiPalma v Phelan, 81 NY2d 754, 756; see Sharrock v Dell Buick-Cadillac, 45 NY2d 152, 158; Moghimzadeh v College of St. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 9:02 pm
"In United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:58 am
United States, 461 U.S. 574 (1983). [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:14 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 5:39 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 10:32 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 9:11 am
The ILB has had a long list of entries on the 7th Circuit decision in the case of United States v. [read post]
31 May 2008, 12:55 am
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 4:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
