Search for: "English v. English"
Results 9221 - 9240
of 11,202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2019, 5:51 am
Kuehnen's panel handed down the ruling in that Unwired Planet v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 9:58 am
So, when it comes to reputed trade marks the extended protection is actionable whenever the relevant public "makes a connection between those marks" or "establishes a link between them" [see CJEU case law in Ferrero v OHMI, C‑552/09 P, Adidas-Salomon and Adidas Benelux, C‑408/01, and Intel Corporation, C-252/07]. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
Others, such as the Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, English and Swedish versions, use verbs or nouns denoting the act of storing goods. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 12:32 pm
Restellini v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:43 pm
Google Spain SL v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 9:47 am
S.A.S. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 11:49 am
In Garrison v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
Now, for the reader to get an idea of the second case, it should be sufficient to say that the word sign at issue was “TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION” (Board of Appeal's decision here) and that the Court consulted the Oxford Dictionary of English, instead of the Grand Larousse en 5 volumes… The IPKat appreciates the General Court's meditations on these two cases. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
" To take only one example: Marshall's holding in McCulloch v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 7:42 am
Following his Opinion earlier today in Pez Hejduk [here], AG Cruz Villalón has in fact just issued another one [once again, available in - amongst others - Italian but not English], this being the much-awaited Opinion in Case C-419/13 Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Dutch Supreme Court seeking clarification as to the following:1. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
The OA articles in this listing were previously referenced on this blog as of 1 January 2021.Bronze OA:"An Analysis of the ECtHR Judgment in the Case of N.D. and N.T. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:04 am
This is the question that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has been asked to address in Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Renckhoff, C-161/17.This morning Advocate General (AG) Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered his Opinion[not yet available in English], and answered in the negative.Let’s see what happened.BackgroundWell, the background is quite ... ridiculous (in the sense that it is ridiculous that litigation is brought in the first place in instances like… [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:05 am
The glyphs used in Klingon are functional, and analogous to typeface designs (which are said in US law to be protectable as industrial designs only, per Adobe Sys. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 8:02 am
At this point, I envision my next post on App Store matters on May 3, when the Epic Games v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 2:58 pm
things come in threes, the Paris Tribunal turned to the terms and conditions of Facebook in a decision handed down on 9 April 2019 (decision: Paris Tribunal (Tribunal de Grande Instance), UFC-Que Choisir v Facebook Inc. (9 April 2019), see herefor the decision in French). [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 7:41 pm
They're really one.Heins takes her title from Felix Frankfurter's concurring opinion in Weiman v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 3:20 am
Interestingly enough and similarly to the AG, the judgment - at least in its English version - refrains from using 'rely' or similar terms. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
” Alternatively, in A v. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 3:36 pm
This is not a K-Mart "blue light special"State v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm
The dispute related to eight articles published online in Swedish by the Defendants that were alleged to be defamatory of C1, a Swedish citizen and director of C2, an English apex holding company. [read post]
