Search for: "English v. English" Results 9221 - 9240 of 11,202
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2010, 3:11 pm by Margaret Schilt
  These sources are essential for English legal history; indeed some of the early cases are still cited, e.g. see U.S. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 12:23 pm by Howard Wasserman
That runs us into a second case, Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am by Jonathan H. Adler
In Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
May, decided in 1987, and Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 5:16 am by Howard Wasserman
A unanimous Supreme Court in Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 3:14 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is a taste:In both the Ninth Circuit and, if the case goes further, in the Supreme Court, it is now apparent that the resolution of the issue of standing to appeal will turn on how those courts interpret the Supreme Court’s 1997 decision in Arizona for Official English v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:49 am by Andrew Dickinson
Harding v Wealands [2007] 1 AC 1, under the pre-existing English rules of applicable law). [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:35 pm by Lyle Denniston
The judge relied quite heavily upon a 1997 decision by the Supreme Court — Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 4:06 am
The difference between "enter into force" and "shall apply" was referred to by the judge as a well established concept in European Union law despite its apparent oddity to English eyes. [read post]