Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 9221 - 9240
of 12,727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
In the Los Angeles Times, David Savage profiles the “odd couple” of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 2:28 pm
The short version is that you shouldn't expect a lot of justice there. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:32 am
Chief Justice Rader wrote the decision in Ultramercial, with Judges Lourie and O’Malley concurring. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 5:02 pm
Further, the Court observed that principles of natural justice should be read in every statute. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 10:23 am
You can find the opinion here. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 6:24 am
Justice Newby of our Supreme Court discussed the movie’s criminal law implications in his concurring opinion in State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 9:18 pm
It might support disarmament of persons adjudicated to be dangerous — as Justice Barrett found when she sat on the Seventh Circuit. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 3:23 am
Prior to her appointment, as most people know, incoming Justice Elena Kagan was the Solicitor General, who has a key role with the Court; not only does the SG argue cases in which the United States is a party, the Court will often seek her opinion on what the government’s position is on certain other cases. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:49 am
Again, from a purely logical standpoint, they’re one and the same. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 4:58 pm
Ortega, and specifically the standard of Justice O’Connor’s plurality opinion in that case. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 5:28 am
So speak up against them all you want, but if you’re too afraid to do so, then blame no one but yourself. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 12:39 pm
" Supporters responded with enthusiasm, surprise at Chief Justice John Roberts Jr.'s break with the Court's conservative justices and calls for a focus on putting the law's provisions into action. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 3:59 pm
Peter Saiers presiding, then asked the prosecutor, "You're going to dismiss Count Two, aren't you? [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 6:44 pm
Okay, so they're paranoid, too. [read post]
16 May 2018, 2:00 pm
As I instructed you at the opening of the trial, it is completely improper to research of Google law and there must be no re occurrence of this. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:45 am
Clearly, the death penalty does not represent justice. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:07 am
The rambling majority opinion by Justice Sotomayor heroically attempts to guide us to an understanding of what constitutes testimonial hearsay, at least in the context of “a nondomestic dispute, involving a victim found in a public location, suffering from a fatal gunshot wound, and a perpretrator whose location was unknown at the time the police located the victim. [read post]
16 May 2018, 2:00 pm
As I instructed you at the opening of the trial, it is completely improper to research of Google law and there must be no re occurrence of this. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 5:45 am
`[T]he primary duty of a prosecutor is not to obtain convictions but to see that justice is done. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm
And: “Miss Rodway QC, who represents the Claimant, has argued that the principle of open justice is satisfied by the Defendant being identified without identification of the Claimant. [read post]
