Search for: "Line v. Line" Results 9221 - 9240 of 45,534
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2020, 5:51 am by Joy Waltemath
In addition, the balance of equities and the public interest weighed in favor of permitting the state to enforce the legislation (Olson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 7:52 pm by Rob Robinson
Editor’s Note: This is the fourth Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey conducted by ComplexDiscovery. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
  The data protection principles were also central to the way in which the much more recent case of GC et. al. v CNIL assessed the processing of past criminal proceedings. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 10:00 am by Amy Teng
The court made clear in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 8:21 am by Elisabeth R. Connell
As we previously reported, Judge Morris applied the three-part test set forth by the Second Circuit in its 1987 decision in Brunner v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Nevertheless, notwithstanding the approach adopted by large search engines to date, name-based searches are only a “particular” (GC et. al. v CNIL at [46]) rather than the only example of processing which clearly satisfies the first threshold. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 2:08 pm
  Second, I doubt that laches is actually up to the task of preventing stale fee motions, as it'll be virtually impossible to show prejudice in most cases, and laches in any event does not provide a bright-line timing rule that both encourages motions by a set limit as well as grants the defendant definite repose after a certain time period -- all of which are definite purposes of a statutory timeliness period.So I'd have been just fine with the opinion if it said that… [read post]