Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 9221 - 9240
of 16,588
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2013, 1:56 am
” Context matters here. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
We assume (for the purposes of this post) that every bad thing that these opinions recount about the defendant’s off-label promotion was true.That doesn’t matter. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:48 am
The ruling marked the first of its kind involving repatriated funds and tax shifting. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 10:04 am
She can’t say for sure. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 3:31 am
She stated, `[I]t's Liana Howard calling again. . . . [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:03 pm
Of course they can’t - first, because they won’t remember the area, and second, probably, because your client actually did signal enough in advance. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:44 pm
Chemical weapons, it seemed, had been consigned to the dustbin of history, no matter the stockpiles that states continued to hold, especially in the Middle East, right up to today. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 10:04 am
”1 September 17 marks “Constitution Day” in the United States, a day that commemorates the approval of the final draft of the Constitution by the U.S. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:57 pm
This isn’t just a conservative thing. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:42 pm
The Lanham Act, which codifies US trade mark law, sets forth the various reasons why a mark will not be accepted for trade mark protection, including a mark which "consists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt, or disrepute." [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 10:52 am
It was a busy day at the court with several preliminary and administrative family law matters on the docket. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:38 pm
For [confusingly] similar trade marks – KATKIT and KIT T KAT Give me a break: the Kit Kat parody video here [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 10:38 pm
Jennifer Quinian says don’t risk that cross-contamination, just get the bird in the oven and cook it to temperature. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 2:58 am
The IPKat was therefore delighted to receive this update from the very Law Commission itself, and would like to thank his correspondents on the matter. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 2:52 pm
Perhaps this marked a modest thaw, in that the FISC restored to the NSA some unilateral—if quite controlled, more heavily DOJ-supervised—authority to consult its vast caches of telephony metadata. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:18 pm
Here, the presence of house marks was essentially dispositive. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 4:53 am
what's cooking in trade marks world? [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
As car manufacturers/assemblers don’t charge for how long it takes them to build their products. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:41 am
The brief doesn’t explain precisely why California has changed its position. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 8:20 am
For more information contact Mark Astarita at 212-509-6544 or at email us [read post]
