Search for: "P. T.2"
Results 9221 - 9240
of 14,913
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2019, 10:02 am
Sherman "Intellectual Property Law" 4thEdition, 2014, p. 285). [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 7:48 am
"According to Princeton Vanguard, "[T]here is only one legal standard for genericness: the two-part test set forth in Marvin Ginn. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 3:54 am
In support of this stance, the court relied on the definition of “trade mark” in section 2(1). [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 9:27 am
P. 23, and they allow for one or more individual named plaintiffs to sue on behalf of a large – sometimes very large – group of unnamed employees, where: 1) the number of putative class members is so large that it would be impractical for them to participate; 2) where the putative class claims are defined by common questions of law or fact; 3) where the representative plaintiffs’ claims or defenses are typical of those of everyone else; and 4) where… [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 8:09 am
" I don't know what number of recordings is overuse, but more convincing to me is their pricing data: even though the audiobooks of public domain novels face competition from free versions on LibriVox, the professional versions still command essentially equivalent prices for all novels, and prices that are only 24% cheaper for public domain novels. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 7:48 am
c=84193&p=irol-faq.3. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 10:07 am
“[P]ast nonenforcement does not necessarily reflect a formal administrative interpretation precluding enforcement, but could instead reflect the exercise of prosecutorial discretion or limited resources …. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 5:26 am
2. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:34 am
I would like to concentrate in this post on the claim in the Klingon Language, “Klingonese or Klingon, the native language of Qo’noS” (p.31). [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 8:49 am
Neoperl’s appeal to the General Court was formally successful (case T‑487/21, IPKat here). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:41 am
El segundo de estos es la Ley local Núm. 44 de 2 de julio de 1985, mejor conocida como la Ley de Discrimen en el Empleo contra Personas con Impedimentos. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 12:33 pm
J. segundo, párrafo cuarto). [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:31 am
Report from JASON (INCLUDES OPINION):Day 2Here is a brief rundown of what I saw on Day 2 of the trial. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 7:34 pm
Don’t Google that. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 12:08 pm
(570) C-A-L-L-D-L-P. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 8:03 am
P. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 4:16 pm
P. 26(a)(1)(A)(iv). [3] 800 F.3d at 1223, 1225. [4] 800 F.3d, at 1228. 5 Id at 1222 [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:45 am
I don’t know if Mark Cuban’s description of what 3M has done here is or is not correct. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 7:09 am
Our earlier post is here.2. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 10:57 am
” N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2). [read post]
