Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 9221 - 9240 of 13,837
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2012, 3:54 pm by National Indian Law Library
United States (tribal records)Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:25 am by Heidi Henson
The NLRB lacked a quorum of board members when it published its rule amending its representation election procedures on December 16, 2011, and the challenged rule is therefore invalid, the District of Columbia federal district court held, in a perhaps tepid — and temporary — victory for opponents of what has been dubbed the board’s “quickie” or “ambush” election rule (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, May 14, 2012,… [read post]
15 May 2012, 4:05 pm by sevach
Por cierto, me agrada especialmente el juez Alex Kozinsky antes citado, presidente de la Corte Suprema de California, ya que es el autor de la sentencia mas famosa de EEUU , dictada en el año 1990 por su sentido del humor al introducir en su célebre sentencia (United States v.Syufy Enterprises, 1990) la cita de 200 títulos de películas entre su argumentación. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:08 pm by Bradley Coxe
Supreme Court, who would then have the opportunity to overturn not only that California law, but all laws in the United States, including Amendment One. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:21 am by ksmcarlson
This is a considerable shift from present practices of the United States. [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:41 am by Nabiha Syed
At the New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin discusses the impact of Chief Justice John Roberts on the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:22 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
United States Department of Health and Human Services & Kathleen Sebelius, here. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:29 am by Marissa Miller
” At UPI, Michael Kirkland discusses the impact of the Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm by Steve Honig
  In the last Bush Administration, the President’s legal office stated that the Federal government could share enforcement of Federal policy with the States, and that the States therefore could have concurrent authority. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
This raises the question of whether these appointments of California state officials violate Article VII, Section 7 of the California Constitution which provides that with certain exceptions ”A person holding a lucrative office under the United States or other power may not hold a civil office of profit. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:55 am by Rosa Schechter
  Beazer Homes USA, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is one of the ten largest single-family homebuilders in the United States. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:22 am by Thomas Kaufman
  This is separate from the issue pending before the United States Supreme Court in Christopher v. [read post]