Search for: "State v. Doctor" Results 9221 - 9240 of 9,600
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2008, 7:55 am
Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504 (1992) (holding that state common law torts were something that was subject to preemption), Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:05 am
District Court for the Western District, styled United States of America v Paul Hollern, Case No. 3:06CR-82-S. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 11:51 pm
The FMLA certification completed by his doctor stated that he was in treatment from "7/29 - 8/11. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
McIlrath, No. 07-1266 Sentence for traveling across state lines to have sex with a minor is affirmed where: 1) remarks of the judge at sentencing discharged his duty to consider not only the sentencing guidelines, but [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Legislatures in the United States and abroad have passed increasingly restrictive and intrusive laws in order to protect the public from convicted sexual offenders. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 12:08 am
 Lackey's secretary called Balducci at 11:16 a.m. to say Lackey was running late at the doctor's office and would call Balducci later. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 11:51 am
v=bhvsJBiEj24 ; at 6:33 in the interview); You can’t even find a bartender in states like Pennsylvania because of the trial lawyers. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 6:44 am
To start, Ratliff's attorney named the wrong doctor as a defendant. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 2:14 pm
That campaign blamed lawsuits for skyrocketing insurance rates and claimed doctors were leaving the state as a result. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 1:36 pm
In the representative case of Pfeffer v. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 1:45 am
Subscription Required APPELLATE DIVISIONSECOND DEPARTMENTEvidence Doctor-Patient Privilege Does Not Bar Prosecutors From Obtaining Blood Sample Under Warrant People v. [read post]