Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 9221 - 9240
of 36,866
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2011, 10:20 am
In McPherson v. [read post]
9 Feb 2025, 5:52 pm
Engels.[1] Northern States Power Company (NSP) had 14 directors, each elected annually for a one-year term by means of cumulative voting. [read post]
9 Feb 2025, 5:52 pm
Engels.[1] Northern States Power Company (NSP) had 14 directors, each elected annually for a one-year term by means of cumulative voting. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:45 am
In 1951, six companies from Arkansas, Louisiana, Texas, and Mississippi formed the Entergy Corporation, a publicly held utility company intended to share the costs and benefits of generating and transmitting power. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:20 am
There's also the issue that Copyright Act damages are set by Congress, rather than awarded pursuant to state law, and a court's scrutiny of a statutory damages range set by Congress raises separation of powers issues. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 9:01 pm
In my latest FindLaw column, I pile on the Obama Justice Department for its wretched brief in Smelt v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 3:40 am
Stoking this outrage, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, with whom Justice Kagan and Jackson joined, “with fear for our democracy,” wrote: The President of the United States is the most powerful person in the country, and possibly the world. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 3:36 pm
“The outcome in New York v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:04 am
I've read Com. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 9:10 am
Ritchie, et al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:21 am
Supreme Court in Nestlé v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 5:39 pm
The state denies that Act 2 exercises any power over state lands. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:07 pm
That underscores why preemption is so powerful. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:28 am
Rosenblatt & Co. v Davidge Data Sys. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:03 am
Business, especially the powerful convention and tourist sector, has taken a hit as a result of S.B. 1070 and calls from out-of-state entities to boycott Arizona. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Just as importantly, perhaps, states perturbed by the undoubtedly correct decision by the Supreme Court in Chisholm v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 2:45 am
A three-fold test for “material considerations” is found in Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1981] AC 578 (“Newbury”). [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332, and other decisions. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Cunningham & Ute Römer-Barron, Four Reasons the Supreme Court Should Reconsider Its Article III Standing Doctrine, (Forthcoming, Ohio State Law Journal Online, v. 85, 2024).Elias Neibart, M.A. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332, and other decisions. [read post]
