Search for: "State v. Weeks"
Results 9221 - 9240
of 42,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
In Nealy v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
On Tuesday, the state of Texas is scheduled to execute Jose Ernesto Medellin, the petitioner in Medellin v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 8:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Mircera (Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta) – US: Federal Circuit revises Amgen v ITC (Patently-O) (Patent Baristas) (ITC 337 Law Blog) (Hal Wegner) (Patent Docs) General Alicia Greenidge to step down as Director of IFPMA (Intellectual Property Watch) Flu crisis could lead to compulsory… [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:15 am
(Docket Report) US: CAFC dismisses case: HIF Bio, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:39 am
Within the past week the U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
This week’s summaries concern: Administrative Law – Civil Rights – Elections – Bankruptcy – Indians, Inuit and Métis Trinity Western University et al. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 2:04 pm
The Court will next issue decisions on Monday, and may have at least one other decision day next week. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 12:21 pm
We were here for three weeks where . . . he gets to crossexamine witnesses; also an opportunity to present evidence information through his lawyer. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 3:25 am
Temporary appointment to a position in the public serviceCSEA Local 1000 v NYS Dept. of Civil Service, App Div, 250 A.D.2d 968, Motion to appeal denied, 92 N.Y.2d 808The State Fair Division of the New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets employed a number of individuals in noncompetitive class or labor class positions and designated them as “temporary employees. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:12 am
Lord v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:42 am
Commentary on last week’s decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer) US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer) US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO rescinds patent claim and continuation rules (IP Spotlight) (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (Inventive Step) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO rescinds patent claim and continuation rules (IP Spotlight) (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (Inventive Step) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO rescinds patent claim and continuation rules (IP Spotlight) (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (Inventive Step) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v… [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:46 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: RIP Google.cn? [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 12:02 pm
Within a few days of each other, the Supreme Court of the United States and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had Apple v. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 11:57 am
But see contra United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 7:13 am
Richard Ortiz – well, less so.United States v. [read post]