Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 9221 - 9240
of 40,668
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2019, 6:25 am
On Monday morning, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Barton v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 6:10 am
As I explain in this article that will appear shortly in Rutgers Law Review, Congress has the authority to count states as ratifying an Article V amendment even when those states subsequently rescinded their ratification. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 5:02 am
[Some interesting words from Justice Douglas.] [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court evaluated sobriety checkpoints (at which everyone must stop and submit to observation and answer some questions) under the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizures, Justice Stevens, in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 1:59 pm
In its opinion, the Seventh Circuit explained that its decision in Richardson v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:18 am
During Monday’s oral argument in Kansas v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:57 am
In my defence this decision is unlikely to be the last word on this point (more on that later) and this is a roundup of several cases. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:07 am
(Irwin Toy Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Since the Supreme Court of Canada decided Rocket v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:21 pm
On 4 November 2019 Warby J gave judgment in the case of Lord Sheikh v Associated Newspapers [2019] EWHC 2947 (QB) finding that a MailOnline article made a defamatory allegation against the the claimant, a Conservative Member of the House of Lords. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm
The following speakers have already committed to speak at the conference: ▪ Eyal Benvenisti, University of Cambridge ▪ Heike Krieger, Freie Universität Berlin ▪ Silja Vöneky, University of Freiburg Call for papers: We now call upon scholars to consider contributing a paper to the conference. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 11:03 am
The CJEU stated that European Union law does not preclude the proprietor of a national trademark from opposing the import of identical goods bearing the same trade mark and coming from another Member State, in which said trade mark, which initially belonged to the same proprietor, is currently owned by a third party. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 10:14 am
Offensive flags, of course, are constitutionally protected just as are offensive words. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:49 am
In Bardales v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:45 am
See Mozes v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:00 am
Sometime after the procedure, the plaintiff was diagnosed as having a nonunion of the femur; in other words, the two sections of plaintiff’s femur did not heal together. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:05 am
I’m then joined by my colleague Professor Jeremy DeBeer to discuss the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision on Keatley Surveying v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Or, as the Supreme Court noted in Arizona v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:35 am
Carlstrom v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:20 am
In Skinner v. [read post]
