Search for: "US v. Banks" Results 9221 - 9240 of 12,628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2009, 8:55 am
De Saad:This is an interesting case involving a former bank VP who had been indefinitely "suspended" due to a little matter of allegations that she helped launder $4 million in drug proceeds.After an acquittal on money laundering and conspiracy, she wound up pleading to a minor money structuring charge and then sued (via an assignment to her criminal defense counsel) for past wages and indemnification from the bank.Judge Scola granted summary judgment to de Saad, and the… [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 10:55 am
  It also considers the fact that rents for an official exercising government shareholder powers aren’t time discounted, but the costs of using a bank to subsidize interest groups are substantially time discounted. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by Douglas Reiser
This case also implies that a bank or financial institution who uses trust funds for payment of debts owed to it (bank paying off line of credit) may be liable for conversion of those funds. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 3:15 pm by Liz Dye
"— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2025-02-12T18:25:19.349ZNew York v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:21 pm by Erik Gerding
But countering subsidies is not so easy: Subsidies are difficult to measure returning us to the problem of calibration. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:29 pm by Erik Gerding
But countering subsidies is not so easy: Subsidies are difficult to measure returning us to the problem of calibration. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 10:42 pm by The Legal Blog
Justice D K JainThe Supreme Court in Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev & Ors. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 1:20 am
The CFAA was enacted in 1984 as a criminal statute to criminalize the theft of national security and banking data. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The Court held possession of a gun was not economic (in Lopez), but that possession of marijuana for home use was (in Gonzales v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:44 pm by Marco Rossi
  For the purpose of identifying the natural person who ultimately owns or controls the tested corporate entity, the Directive adopts the “more than 25% shareholding or ownership interest” test, as an indication or presumption of beneficial ownership, and uses both a direct and indirect ownership test. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Moreover, a threat to do what a person already has the legal right to do, in this case, to enforce the law, does not constitute duress (Marine Midland Bank v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
He also demanded that no action be taken by the Practices to encumber any of their assets in connection with the Surgicare deal, and he warned that if such assets were used he would voice his objections to the prospective lending banks. [read post]