Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 9221 - 9240
of 9,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2008, 4:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 2:26 pm
Collectively, they make a compelling case for change.In Shaw v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Ctr. for Women v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 7:00 am
” Bullock v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 2:05 pm
Reports of the ruling, which are often more frustrating than illuminating, can be found here, here, here, and here.Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find a copy of the actual ruling online.Based on the reports, it appears that Judge Folsom ruled that the defense had presented sufficient evidence of unlawful command influence for the burden to shift to the government to disprove the existence of unlawful command influence beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:17 am
Here is the abstract:During his confirmation hearings before the Judiciary Committee of the United States Senate, then Judge John Roberts testified that he wanted to be a "modest" judge. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
BOTELHO, Petitioners v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:11 pm
Witt v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 9:32 am
Supreme Court reaffirmed the rule in the Quill v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 9:32 am
Supreme Court reaffirmed the rule in the Quill v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 9:42 am
United States and Peretz v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 9:14 am
Friends of the Everglades v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 4:21 am
Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 3:49 am
Paper money is an entirely visual affair in the United States. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Supreme Court, May 12, 2008 Gonzales v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 9:38 pm
United States, 364 U.S. 40, 49 (1960). [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
Indeed, in both states a succession of Republican governors in recent years had meant that the high courts of the state were not totally dominated by Democratic appointees. [read post]
16 May 2008, 6:42 am
I thought, for instance, that the Court would not grant cert in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:18 pm
In an illustration of legislative sausage making at its finest, the legislature passed and yesterday the Governor signed into law, a bill that gives the insurance industry and the trial lawyers pieces of what they wanted this year, over the opposition of the State Insurance Commissioner. [read post]
