Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges" Results 9221 - 9240 of 16,255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2016, 5:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
The constitutional rights at issue here are the rights to due process and equal protection, as protected by both the Fourteenth and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:39 am by John Elwood
Judge, 10-367, and Quinn v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 5:00 am by Matt Danzer
After the ups and downs of this week’s hearings in the military commissions case of United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:37 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
On July 20, 2018, they submitted a response (hereinafter Response)[i] to the Report of the Federal Judiciary Workplace Conduct Working Group to the Judicial Conference[ii] of the United States (June 1, 2018) (hereinafter Report) (available here together with the executive summary). [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 11:38 am by Kyle Duncan
Hodges, fifteen states submitted an amicus brief cautioning that a decision constitutionalizing the issue of same-sex marriage would repudiate the Court’s own recent decision in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 5:09 pm
  The United States is a nation of laws and so we must abide by these rulings. [read post]
2 May 2010, 10:00 am by Howard Friedman
Goord, (2d Cir., April 27, 2010), the 2nd Circuit remanded with instructions that plaintiff should be granted leave to amend his complaint that prison staff members violated his free exercise rights when they failed to provide him with an alternative method of tuberculosis testing consistent with his religious beliefs instead of placing him in confinement.In United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Judge Brinkema rightly rejected this argument, citing the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in McCreary County v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Alexandria Women's Health Clinic (1993) (interpreting § 1985(3)'s first clause); United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., Loc. 610, AFL-CIO v. [read post]